OES or XRF for Slag Analysis? Pros and Cons

Accurate slag analysis is vital in the steel industry to ensure process control, optimize raw material use, and maintain product quality. Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) and X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) are the most common techniques for slag analysis. Below is a detailed comparison of their advantages and disadvantages, helping you understand which method might suit your operational needs best.

X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF): The Established Backbone

Advantages

1. Industry Standard:
   XRF has long been the preferred technique for slag analysis in steel mills. It is widely trusted for its reliability, consistency, and familiarity among operators.

2. CRM-Based Calibration:
   XRF uses Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) for calibration, providing highly accurate and standardized results. Its accuracy has been validated by international round-robin tests, ensuring comparability across facilities.

Disadvantages

1. Slow Analysis Time:
   XRF requires 10–15 minutes to deliver results, significantly slower than OES. This delay increases labor costs and limits its use in time-sensitive decision-making.

2. Post-Mortem Results:
   The slower analysis time means adjustments can only be made after processes are completed, making it unsuitable for in-situ monitoring or dynamic operations.

3. High Maintenance Costs:
   XRF systems require frequent maintenance and replacement of wear parts, resulting in higher operational costs over time.

4. Sample Preparation Errors:
   The multi-step preparation process (crushing, grinding, de-metallization, pressing) introduces a risk of errors such as:

   • Insufficient de-metallization skewing results.
   • Grinding issues like large grains or agglomeration reducing accuracy.
   • Segregation during pressing introducing inconsistencies.

5. Complex Equipment Needs:
   XRF analysis requires multiple devices—grinders, presses, crushers, and de-metallizers—which are costly to purchase, maintain, and operate.

6. Weakness in Light Element Detection:
   XRF struggles to detect light elements like silicon (Si) and magnesium (Mg), which are critical for slag analysis, making it less effective in certain applications.

QLX9 slag analyzer in a laboratory environment during operation

Slag sample input in a QLX9 slag analyzer

EAF slag sample, ready to be analyzed without furhter sample preparation

Laboratory Technician Operating the QLX9 Slag Analyzer for a rapid analysis within 20 seconds

Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES): The Emerging Contender

Advantages

1. Minimal Sample Preparation:
   OES requires little to no sample preparation. Unlike XRF, there is no need for grinding, pressing, or crushing, streamlining operations and saving time.

2. Speed:
   OES delivers results in as little as 20 seconds, providing near-instant feedback. This rapid turnaround is ideal for real-time decision-making and reduces labor and automation costs.

3. In-Situ Analysis:
   With its ability to provide results directly on-site, OES enables immediate adjustments to slag composition in electric arc furnaces (EAF) or ladle furnaces (LF), reducing process disruptions.

4. Larger Sample Quantities:
   OES can analyze 20–200 grams of material at once, offering better representation of the slag’s overall composition and reducing variability.

5. Contactless Analysis:
   OES can analyze hot or warm materials without the need for cooling, making it ideal for fast-paced production environments.

6. Consistency and Precision:
   OES delivers stable and precise results over time. Its performance requires only occasional standardization, ensuring operational consistency without constant recalibration.

7. No Recalibration Needed:
   Unlike XRF, OES systems do not require frequent recalibration, saving time and reducing maintenance interruptions.

8. Low Maintenance Costs:
   OES instruments are virtually maintenance-free, with no wear parts that require regular replacement, making them more cost-effective over their lifespan.

Disadvantages

1. Calibration Challenges:
   OES calibration for slag analysis typically relies on secondary materials rather than CRMs, which limits its applicability to internal process monitoring rather than formal quality control or standardized reporting.

2. Limited Industry Adoption:
   While OES is proven in many steel mills and is gaining traction, it has yet to achieve widespread adoption across the industry. However, this is changing as more facilities recognize its advantages.

Comparison and Why OES is the Future

XRF: Trusted but Outdated

XRF remains the standard for slag analysis, thanks to its reliability, use of CRMs, and widespread adoption. Many steel mills already have legacy XRF systems in place, and the method works well for routine analysis. However, XRF’s slow analysis time, high maintenance costs, and poor detection of light elements make it less suitable for modern, fast-paced production environments.

OES: A Modern Solution for Emerging Needs

OES is a disruptive alternative that addresses many of XRF’s limitations. Its speed, minimal sample preparation, and ability to analyze light elements such as silicon (Si) and magnesium (Mg) make it ideal for the challenges of today’s steel production. Real-time monitoring with OES ensures precise process control, helping optimize slag composition to improve foaming, reduce refractory wear, and enhance yield.

For steel mills dealing with volatile input streams, such as secondary resources, OES provides the speed and flexibility needed to respond to changes dynamically. Its low maintenance costs and long-term reliability also make it a compelling choice for facilities looking to reduce operational expenses.

Conclusion: OES has the potential to become the Future slag analyzer of choice

While XRF is still the backbone of slag analysis in many steel mills, OES is emerging as the superior choice for modern operations. The steel industry’s need for faster, more accurate, and cost-effective solutions makes OES the natural evolution in slag analysis technology. For facilities prioritizing real-time in-situ control, precise light element analysis, and reduced labor & maintenance costs, OES has the potential to become the analytical default solution of the future. Investing in OES today means not only fulfilling todays demands for slag analysis, but also preparing for the demands of tomorrow’s steelmaking processes.

Questions: alexander.schlemminger@quantolux.de

Regular Updates on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexander-schlemminger-44768187/